If you're impressed with the recover from JPEGs, you should be astounded by what RAWs can give you. I think this is what you're saying and if so, I sort of agree.Ģ) Convenience. If I have limited options for editing because I shot JPEG-only, I guess I'd be able to publish the pictures sooner. I come back from a trip and have thousands of pictures to go through. Some people are gear heads and want every advantage that a technology or a technique can bring in pursuit of an image that is that little bit better.ġ) Time. Some people are completely happy with cell phone pictures. (Basically you can treat them as separate images or ignore the JPGES.) Good luck figuring out your own path! But Lightroom is not great at managing that. I still shoot primarily in RAW + JPEG, largely to keep my options open. Though lots of people who will think your crazy or will nod in agreement. It can become anything, so your creativity can take it wherever you want it to go. (Though you can change your emulsion at any time, not just when selecting your next roll.) And on the other side of that coin, a RAW file is a blank slate. It causes you to focus on different things. You load your emulsion and then the image is locked in. On an emotional level, I like how straight JPEGS are like going back to film. On the other hand, there are situations, especially with tricky lighting, where having the RAW file can make an appreciable difference. There are certain subjects that I try not to shoot in RAW (don’t need thousands of RAW images of my cats). And RAW files can often take a fair bit of work to get back to the SOOC JPEG. At the same time, JPEGs aren’t great at carrying XMP data, and I’d generally love them to have a tad more flexibility (I’ve had Lightroom lose all the XMP data on edited JPEGS multiple times before). So the quality will be exactly the same as out of camera, but with some increased ease of use from a computer GUI. You connect your camera to the computer and the connected camera does the processing. If you're mostly concerned about getting the fuji quality jpegs, consider using FUJI X RAW STUDIO, a free app. That way, I don't have any work to do on the computer later. I sometimes do this while I'm walking around shooting. When in playback mode, push Q to bring up the raw processing options. You can process your RAWs into JPEGs in camera. (For example, I usually have my Fuji set to be more green + yellow.) I go to "white balance" and select "Shift", then set it to -2 R -2 B. If you want to use JPEG only, you should practice messing with the white balance settings, because white balance is one thing that is very difficult to correct without the RAW. Also, sometimes you want less "accurate" white balance. I find, for example, that in bright daylight, white balance can come out a little magenta and sickly blue sometimes. The white balance and light meter on Fuji cameras are great, but aren't perfect. That said, I still shoot with RAW + JPEG. I agree with you about the burden of processing tons of photos.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |